We don’t need a reminder from faux feminists on the incredible value of women. None of us would be here without one. Motherhood made us all possible, including those who celebrate abortion.
Because these pro-abortion activists weren’t aborted, they have the ability to promote any nonsense they want, like the Day Without A Woman strike. Yes. Remove women from the public space and the world will learn how vital they are. Wouldn’t the same apply if we removed all the men from the scene? We’re both needed. Liberal feminists don’t want harmony. They prefer the sound of their own discord, decrying unequal pay, demolishing biological gender, and demanding that all humans (particularly the unborn) are not equal.
Imagine the real impact of A Day Without A Woman inside a Planned Parenthood? Now that would have reverberations for generations. Nobody would die. There are, on a daily basis, 888 human beings violently dismembered in the name of “choice” in Planned Parenthood abortion businesses across the country. No one ever dies inside of America’s pregnancy resource centers, but millions have been killed inside our nation’s population control centers.
Planned Parenthood, the lead partner in the abortion-centric Women’s March and major propagandist for the “War on Women” hasn’t yet publicly endorsed A Day Without A Woman strike. They apparently don’t believe enough in the victim-based messaging that their own creation is touting. Planned Parenthood constantly beats the drum for “equal pay”, derides any efforts to control illegal immigration, and paints a false and medieval picture of violence against women in America today. But they won’t shut down their abortion mills on the 8th. They won’t be taking their cut in (equal) pay, just cutting off human lives. The “strike” calls for women not to work (whether paid or unpaid) and not to spend money. Does this include spending money on elective abortions?
If killing innocent human lives makes us all “equal”, by the way, why doesn’t it apply to everyone? How is there “equal protection under the law” if women can do something that men cannot, or more accurately, that abortionists can do what fathers cannot. America’s supremely wrong judges have interpreted the 14th Amendment with blatant discrimination. All sarcasm aside, “Abortion rights” are inherently unequal to those forced to fund it, to the fathers who can do nothing to stop it, to the women who are misinformed about it, and to the unborn (and occasionally their mothers) killed by it.
The (broken) heart of the Women’s March is revealed by its complete devotion to the violence of abortion. President Trump exposed this quite brilliantly by offering to continue the funding of corrupt Planned Parenthood if it simply stopped committing abortions. Social media erupted in faux-choice indignation. The abortion chain’s president, Cecile Richards, tweeted that “Planned Parenthood is proud to provide abortion—a necessary service that’s as vital to our mission as birth control or cancer screenings.” Well, except that breast cancer screenings (which bring in little revenue) have dropped a whopping 519,158 since Richards took over the helm at Planned Parenthood, now amounting to only 363,803. Abortion (which brings in over 80% of the abortion giant’s health services revenue) has risen from 289,750 killed in 2006 to 323,999 killed in 2015. Obviously, cancer screenings are not as vital.
How about A Day Without A Woman demoralized and dehumanized by an Islamic theocracy? Linda Sarsour, one of the co-founders of the narrowly “inclusive” Women’s March, is a self-described Palestinian-American-Muslim. For five painful hours, I watched the entire DC Women’s March, via C-SPAN. There’s nothing quite like American women, the freest in the world, decrying faux oppression as activists like Ms. Sarsour praise Islam—the most oppressive religion in the world for women. If Islam is so revolutionary for women, perhaps we should adopt a model of human rights from any Muslim theocracy. Any takers?